In the Ethics mini-case template, which step involves proposing mitigation strategies?

In the Ethics mini-case template, which step involves proposing mitigation strategies?

• A. Identify harm
• B. Analyze the mechanism
• C. Propose mitigation strategies
• D. Evaluate trade-offs

Answer: (C)

Turning ethical analysis into concrete mitigation actions is what this step asks you to do. Proposing mitigation strategies means you outline specific actions, safeguards, or policy/design changes aimed at reducing or preventing the harm identified earlier in the template. It’s about moving from understanding that harm could occur to describing how to prevent it or lessen its impact. The other steps serve different purposes: identifying harm is about recognizing that a problem may exist; analyzing the mechanism digs into how the harm happens and the causal pathways; evaluating trade-offs weighs the costs, benefits, and value tensions of possible approaches after you’ve proposed mitigations to help decide which path to take.

Turning ethical analysis into concrete mitigation actions is what this step asks you to do. Proposing mitigation strategies means you outline specific actions, safeguards, or policy/design changes aimed at reducing or preventing the harm identified earlier in the template. It’s about moving from understanding that harm could occur to describing how to prevent it or lessen its impact. The other steps serve different purposes: identifying harm is about recognizing that a problem may exist; analyzing the mechanism digs into how the harm happens and the causal pathways; evaluating trade-offs weighs the costs, benefits, and value tensions of possible approaches after you’ve proposed mitigations to help decide which path to take.